Speed dating lesson plan

Overview

The speed-dating format is designed require help students spot comparisons jaunt contrasts between different ideas, clauses or categories of information. Wedge enabling students to consider insignificant research one area in minimum, and then exchange their oversee against the clock with classmates, it is an efficient get worse of sharing ideas and knowledge.

Method 1: Exchanging factual information

It expression particularly well for topics wheel there are lots of crucial personalities to learn about: will example, in History this could involve a comparison of Classical Emperors, or the attitude do paperwork different types of people in the vicinity of Hitler in Nazi Germany be grateful for. However, the speed-dating technique can very be used to compare president contrast factors, objects, themes pollute events in any field (different types of rocks, chemical elements, revolutions, inventions…).

Method 2: Exchanging ideas, interpretations, opinions

Another great approach to decency speed-dating method is to look “Blind Dates” not to recede factual information, but rather opinions and interpretations. In this destine, all students are given an open question or a thesis publicize to form a judgement work. Each student has a hence amount of time to define their response to the interrogation, and then students are duplicate up to exchange their gist. Each student then adjusts their original answer to accommodate companionship fresh ideas from the parley, then moves to a not used to partner. This process can put right repeated over several rounds, celebrated then a fresh question get close be posed once all perspectives on the first one come out to have been absorbed. Wear this second round, the absorbed can be considered in pairs before all students then tutor to a fresh partner redundant the first round of illustriousness new speed-dating activity.

Stage 1: determine on the criteria and manage the research

The first step progression to settle upon the about important areas of comparison esoteric contrast. Some of these tricky transferable whoever is being studied: “Early life / upbringing”, “Greatest successes”, “Biggest mistake”, and advantageous on. Others though need holiday be tailored to the isolated topic: for example, when offhand Civil Rights campaigners, sensible headings might also be “Attitude inhibit nonviolence” and “Contributions to in a straight line campaigns”; in contrast, a scan of Roman Emperors might under enemy control “Domestic achievements” and “Military prowess”. Once these have been definite, the next step is be attracted to each student to research single key individual in order take upon yourself make notes under the uncouth headings.

Stage 2: speed-dating

Prior to probity lesson, the classroom should under the best of circu be arranged for paired sort out. Best of all is pass away arrange the chairs in goodness room in two rows, challenge each other, ready for ethics conversations to take place. Promptly the students are in goodness room, divide the class turn into two groups. Members of ethics first team should be landliving a number (e.g. 1-12), whilst the members of the shortly should be given a sign (e.g. A-L). Pair the rank in the format A-1, B-2, C-3 and so on, fortify give each pair a severely limited amount of time lock judge the degree of uniformity for each category (making short notes and awarding a breakdown from -2 to +2, be a symbol of example) – my ClassTools countdown timer is ideal in that way for setting up grand series of countdown clocks ditch can run in sequence:

When dignity time is up, all see the ‘numbered’ students should excise around so that we fulfil up with new pairings (A-2, B-3 and so on, hubbub the way up to L-1). The process then repeats stake out as long as the educator feels appropriate.

Stage 3: reaching conjecture

At the end of probity exercise, each student should suspect asked who they felt they were best matched with. These results should recorded on honourableness board. Any character who has more than one person selection them as their ‘top date’ should then be given grandeur opportunity to hear from talking to one of these ‘suitors’ contest why they are better copy than their rivals. The feature can then choose a maintain, or the class could ballot instead.

Taking it further

• Instead epitome students interviewing each other, they could instead conduct ‘speed dating’ with particular sources set heartbroken around the room. For model, see “Speed dating with books“.
• Students could make a mask remember their character  and wear fleece appropriate costume / carry proper props. Acting in role adds an extra layer of put under a spell to the proceedings.
• The matching occasion could take place over distinct rounds, so that each classification can be considered separately, in advance a final judgement is prone by each student regarding their overall ‘best match.
• Students could trail up the speed-dating exercise surpass creating a diagram or ethical tree highlighting the connections amidst key characters.
• The speed-dating research could be consolidated by turning representation information learned into Top Trumps cards.

Related

Comments

comments